Which one is stronger, Durant or Xiaoka? It’s very clear from the perspective of personal data!

Durant and Kat are both top-notch superstars among the active players. Both of them won two championships and two finals best player titles. So who will be stronger in history? It feels very clear from the data aspect!

Kar and Durant, as long as they waved their sickle on the offensive end, they scored quickly. He averaged 27.3 points per game in his career, shooting 49.9%, three-point shooting percentage 38.8%, free throw shooting percentage 88.6%, and his real shooting percentage as high as 62.4%. Its indiscriminate singles ability, mid- and long-distance projection and height wingspan advantages make it an all-time scorer. Defensive end: Although it is not known for its defense, it can still provide high-quality assisted defense and frame protection with its height, wingspan and mobility (1.1 steals per game + 1.1 blocks per game in his career). Peak performance: 2013-14 season (MVP season) averaged 32 points, 7.4 rebounds and 5.5 assists per game, shooting percentage of 50.3%, and three-point shooting percentage of 39.1%.

Nets Big Three

Xiaoka is mainly famous for his first-hand Jordan-style mid-range shot on the offensive end. He averaged 20 points, 6.4 rebounds and 3 assists per game in his career, shooting 49.5% from the field, 38.6% from three-point shooting percentage and 87.4% from free throw percentage. It is known for its mid-range back-to-body singles, emergency stop jump shots and efficient endings. Defensive end: Two-time best defensive player (DPOY), three-time best defensive team, famous for "death entanglement", is an all-time outside defender. Peak performance: 25.5 points, 5.8 rebounds and 3.5 assists per game in the 2016-17 season (second in MVP), shooting percentage of 48.5%, and three-point shooting percentage of 38%.

Small card

Overall, Durant completely suppresses small cards in offensive data, especially in scoring efficiency and output. Small cards are more dominant on the defensive end, but the offensive data is relatively inferior.