Even the abandoned players understand Manchester United s problems. Rashford talks about Manchester United s reconstruction: I ve been changing coaches and changed my loneliness

Rashford, who was loaned to Barcelona, accepted an exclusive interview with English legend Leinkell. This time he talked about Manchester United's reconstruction. Rashford believes that Manchester United's reconstruction has never really begun, but has been changing directions, which has caused the players to be at a loss, and the youth training system cannot effectively transfusion blood to the first team.

You see, even Manchester United abandoned players know what the problem is. At first I wanted the traditional British Moyes, later I wanted Van Gaal, who passed the control system, then Mourinho, who wanted to defend and counterattack, Solskjaer, and Dutchman Tenhamer Tenhamch's high-level conversion. Now the new head coach has come with all attacks and defenses. Let's see what Rashford said first.

Rashford probably said this: "Liverpool has also experienced reconstruction. They signed Klopp and have always supported Klopp. Liverpool was not successful at the beginning, but everyone remembered that Klopp competed with Manchester City for the last few years of coaching Liverpool. To complete the transformation, you must formulate a firm plan and recognize your situation. We have tried different styles and different head coaches, but in the end they were in trouble."

Rashford also used the Ferguson era as an example: "During the Ferguson era, Manchester United's first-team and youth training had a unified system, so you can continue to promote youth training for 15 years. Any successful team has its own principles. The head coach who joins the team must follow this principle." What does Rashford mean? For a simple example, any head coach who coaches Ajax must use the 433 full offense and all defense system. You can make variants on the 433 system, but you cannot leave this framework; Barcelona's head coach has also been looking for the head coach of the pass control system, and short pass penetration is the signature. Since Manchester City started the Golden Dollar Football, its style has always been towards the passing and control system. From Perkin, Mancini to Guardiola, the technical school has become deeper and deeper, and there is an obvious step-by-step process.

Then, there must be fans giving examples to Real Madrid and Chelsea, but Real Madrid and Chelsea are not without their own systems. You either use the football director to build a system and find a head coach with a similar style to rebuild, or you completely trust the head coach and completely rebuild.

What is the biggest problem for Manchester United now? It is not a question of the head coach's ability, but a question of the head coach's system. Everyone always has an idea: give results first. Today, it is said that Manchester United cannot play as a single midfielder, tomorrow it is said that Manchester United is not suitable for high-pressing, the day after tomorrow it is said that Manchester United is not suitable for passing control, and the day after tomorrow it is said that Manchester United is not suitable for three central defenders, this is not suitable and that is not suitable, and there are not many systems suitable for Manchester United.

Of course, you may say that you need to find the right system to start reconstruction. The problem is that your pass-through system is a championship in Manchester City, and a relegation in Burnley. Your high-level system is a championship in Liverpool and a relegation in Manchester United. Any system has a successful side and a failed side, and there is no perfect tactic in this world.

What's more, the normal team's approach is: since the player is not suitable for the system, then change to a suitable player. Manchester United's approach is different. Players are not suitable for the system. That is because your head coach is incompetent. If you change to another head coach, this player cannot be sold or that player cannot be sold. Your head coach will do it yourself.

Isn’t this a hurry to achieve quick success? Isn’t this what Rashford said: Never began to truly rebuild? If you want to complete reconstruction and tactical transformation, but you are unwilling to sacrifice your achievements for a period of time, then you can only keep cycling and trial and error. Guardiola gave up England goalkeeper Joe Hart. He didn't find a suitable goalkeeper immediately. He changed several times to find the right one. Manchester United's approach is: if you change a player, the player is not suitable. It is not until you continue to find the right one, but to prove that the method of changing players is wrong.

I was the same before, thinking that Manchester United should have a strong head coach, but since the Soshau era, I have firmly supported any head coach. Gary Neville seems to have experienced such a mental journey. He scolded Amorin and Ten Hach more than once in his live show, but he still insisted that he should not change his coaches. He even said that he communicated with Manchester United's famous players in group chats, and felt that it was too much of a loss for Manchester United to change their coaches frequently.

If you have to talk about the system in the Ferguson period, the Ferguson period never flew together, and the Ferguson period was always a wing change. The biggest feature of Ferguson's period is that he is good at breaking through inwards on the left and crossing on the right. The two wings have different configurations and the offensive position is closer to the three-center-back system. Central defenders like Wesbring and O'Shea can play right-backs. Ferguson is indeed not rigid, but the things in his bones during the Ferguson's period are all close: conversion and fast attack, which is what was played in Soshau's period. The problem is, you didn’t admit it during the Sosha period.

PS: There will be some remarks in the comment area that blindly guesses, "You criticize Rashford before, but now you are quoted by Rashford, you are a fence-between." So, people with diode thinking and black or white, please see what you are talking about?