The ban on the AFC Champions League is not necessarily a bad thing. The overall cost is equal to Delgado s loan? Wang Dalei apologized

The ban on the AFC Champions League is not necessarily a bad thing. The total amount of the penalty is Delgado's loan fee? The AFC subsidy + reward funds were refunded, and the fines were not refunded in the seven games in the middle. Wang Dalei apologized by "throwing the armband" and all public opinion should be turned on here.

The penalty for the AFC's six-year late period was originally announced by the AFC to be qualified for the AFC Champions League, which made fans think that the "retreatment incident" had been over. Now the AFC clearly stipulates a penalty. Taishan is prohibited from participating in the AFC Champions League matches for two seasons, refunding the AFC subsidy + winning reward, and imposing a fine of 50,000 US dollars withdrawal + subsidy of Ulsan 40,000 US dollars. This fee is basically equal to Delgado's loan to Chengdu City, and the AFC's fine in the seven games of Taishan will not be returned.

However, this suspension penalty may not be a bad thing for Taishan. First of all, the AFC's penalty time is the 25-26 season and the two seasons of the 26-27 season. This season is included, and Taishan cannot score in the AFC quota this season. For Taishan, which has been updated, there is no AFC goal, that is, no performance requirements. It only needs to make updates and cultivate the experience and attitude of young players in this two seasons.

Wang Dalei apologized after the red card "hand-throwing incident". Although it attracted widespread attention and was full of controversy about the candidate for the goalkeeper position of Taishan, the AFC Champions League incident also sounded a wake-up call for fans. You cannot change the game process and results, but it can affect Taishan's negative effects, and fans should turn it over.