The team s AFC Champions League cycle is a weird one. Who decides this rotation? It s not cost-effective to consider the interests.

It takes money to win the championship club, and you can make money by winning the AFC Champions League. Shouldn’t the club choose this way?

2. Head coach?

The four teams participating in the AFC Champions League are all foreign coaches and famous coaches. If it is their decision, it is indeed a bit incredible. As a famous coach, will he use his career to bet on his own? It's unlikely to look!

If we rotate in another way, we actually have a chance to win, but we don’t consider the long-term interests. The actual interests of the club and the players are very considerable:

1. Establish the club image.

This is an intangible asset that can bring energy and achievements in Asian arenas. In addition to direct income, the club will not receive less indirect income.

2. Received support from fans across the country.

Whether you participate in the AFC Champions League, you will receive support from fans across the country. This kind of support is not difficult to monetize, and it is also the greatest wealth for players and teams.

Unfortunately, such a good opportunity was given up at will.

They deserve to be praised for Chengdu Rongcheng. They almost did their best, but they were still conservative in the second half. If they did it again, Felpe, Romulo and Leccet would not have been replaced so early, especially Felpe's fate became the turning point of the game. Delgado's red card in stoppage time can only be said to be time and fate!

Not mentioning the other three teams. Overall, the performance of the four teams in the first round of the AFC Champions League was really disappointing. From the perspective of economic and social benefits, they made the worst choice! Friends, what do you think?

source:kq 7m