With G6 Thunder 91: 108 Losing Pacers, Dagnot and the coaching staff are likely to make 3 major changes

If the reasons for the failure of G6 are summarized, the main reason is that the Pacers' all members are "online". For the Thunder, the finals have been transformed from 7 games to "a final victory or defeat", but the Thunder still has a home advantage!

Then, in the face of the arrival of G7, Thunder coach Dagenut and the coaching staff are very likely to make the following three major changes.

1. SGA spares no effort in single-point killing

After all, the Thunder is still a team led by offense, and SGA's "indiscriminate singles" is the only way for the Thunder to win. In the first 6 games of the finals, SGA won all the hard-working and capable of playing singles! If you have to reserve some energy for SGA, the Thunder will lose.

So, G7 doesn't have to consider rest. SGA's breakthrough must be given enough CPI! SGA must be a leading style, not a basic style.

2. Still tying Halliburton

Pacers are not a team that is particularly good at attacking. Halliburton's brain shines in G6. Judging from the entire 6 games, Halliburton is different from SGA. His absolute scoring ability and desire are not as strong as SGA.

or grab Halliburton's breakthrough route and let him pass the ball! This choice will give other Pacer players a lot of opportunities, but it is difficult for other Pacers to drive the pace of the Pacers, so it is better to focus on the key points.

3. Go all out to reduce the rhythm

Although the Thunder also likes to play fast pace, when encountering the Pacers, they still play slow-paced games, which is more beneficial to the Thunder! After all, in terms of individual singles and scoring points, the Thunder is better. The G7 Thunder has a home court, and breaking through multiple positions is also conducive to getting foul opportunities.

Overall, I am optimistic about the Thunder G7 winning the championship!